Living with a comet: a COSIMA team perspective

Comet dust particles may be small, but they come in large numbers. COSIMA Principal Investigator Martin Hilchenbach shares some impressive facts about the instrument’s performance, and reflects on the personal highlights of the team during Rosetta’s mission.

rosetta_cosima_numbers

Rosetta’s dust analysing instrument COSIMA (COmetary Secondary Ion Mass Analyser) has had a busy two years at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: 31 000 dust particles collected at the last count (mid-August 2016). And as Martin puts it “..which are soon to be returned to the surface of the comet!”

Impressively, one single COSIMA team member, Sihane Merouane,  identified and labelled all imaged particles and compiled the archive list, and 6053 particles now have proper names – the first assignments given for COSIMA and the wider Rosetta team members and their families. According to Martin, it would take around five hours to read out the list of names assigned to the particles on just one target. There have been 21 targets  in total exposed.

Meet some of the COSIMA grain family! The target plate measures 1cm across, and shows dust grains collected between 11 August and 12 December 2014. Credits: ESA/Rosetta/MPS for COSIMA Team MPS/CSNSM/UNIBW/TUORLA/IWF/IAS/ESA/BUW/MPE/LPC2E/LCM/FMI/UTU/LISA/UOFC/vH&S.

Meet some of the COSIMA grain family! The target plate measures 1cm across, and shows dust grains collected between 11 August and 12 December 2014. Credits: ESA/Rosetta/MPS for COSIMA Team MPS/CSNSM/UNIBW/TUORLA/IWF/IAS/ESA/BUW/MPE/LPC2E/LCM/FMI/UTU/LISA/UOFC/vH&S.

And these targets are small – just one centimetre square each. Of course, the comet dust is even smaller; COSIMA is optimized to study particles a few tens to hundreds of micrometres in size – although the largest particle imaged by COSIMA exceeded 2 mm!

The grains were identified in 9522 snapshots made by the COSIMA microscope, and selected grains were analysed with a secondary ion mass spectrometer. That is, they were fired at with a beam of indium ions, sparking individual ions (secondary ions) from their surfaces, which were then analysed by the mass spectrometer. This process reveals the composition of the grains, which in turn contributes to our understanding about the composition of the primordial matter from the early Solar System.

While at Comet 67P/C-G COSIMA fired its ion beam 8 billion times, resulting in the detection of 35 million silicon secondary ions, 2.8 million carbon ions, 13 million sodium ions and 1 million magnesium ions, as well as generating 34 595 secondary ion mass spectra.

Martin notes: “We had to take a break with these particular measurements after 3 770 secondary mass spectra, between mid autumn 2014 and spring 2015, in order to restore the primary ion gun subsystem which operated outside of the nominal operational parameters. Thanks to the outstanding achievements of Andreas Koch, Laurent Thirkell, Jouni Rynö and Henning Fischer, we could continue using the gun and collected a further 30,825 mass spectra.”

Reflecting on how the team’s personal lives have evolved over the course of the mission, Martin notes that 7 team members and their spouses have collectively had 12 babies since Rosetta launched in 2004. He also notes that all the software written for the COSIMA development, testing, operation and archiving since 1998 has spanned 12 programming languages, more languages than spoken by the 59-strong COSIMA team.

For the software savvy readers amongst you, the 12 programming languages and the number of lines written in each are as follows:

  • 4989 lines in Assembly
  • 80718 lines in C
  • 58591 lines in Erlang
  • 37899 lines in Forth
  • 16659 lines in Fortran
  • 6510 lines in IDL
  • 6510 lines in Julia
  • 84 lines in KSC
  • 909 lines in Octave
  • 7288 lines in Python
  • 4452 lines in SQL
  • 21232 lines in Tcl/Tk

(That’s a total of 245 841 total lines of software code since 1998!)

Programming is not the only thing that happens on Earth while COSIMA is busy collecting dust. The COSIMA team have prepared and worked with 304 reference model test targets for secondary ion yield calibrations as well as instrument parameter fine tuning, and the vacuum pumps of the COSIMA reference model has operated for 102,720 hours.

Like many of Rosetta’s instruments, COSIMA was on the drawing board from an early stage. Martin recalls: “One team member was already involved with Rosetta and COSIMA in 1984, in the very first meeting of the science study team of what was then the “Comet Nucleus Sample Return” cornerstone mission of the newly defined Horizon 2000 program of ESA. In the early 1990s, the mission evolved into a comet rendezvous mission dedicated to the characterisation of cometary material. One of the key arguments at that time was that if we could not bring cometary samples back to the laboratory on Earth, then we should take key laboratory instruments to the comet. COSIMA, along with many other instruments, was already part of the discussion then, and we’re very happy with how it’s all worked out!”

On summing up the highlights of COSIMA’s discoveries, Martin concludes: the tiny bits and pieces of dust particles collected in the coma of Comet 67P/C-G revealed their heterogeneous composition, their fragility and their close family relation to interplanetary dust particles.

This post is part of a series that looks behind the scenes of the instrument teams to find out what it was really like “living with a comet” for two years.

COSIMA stories featured on this blog
Profiling COSIMA’s dust grain family
First release of Rosetta comet phase data from four orbiter instruments
COSIMA: Meet the family
COSIMA watches comet shed its dusty coat
COSIMA detects sodium and magnesium in a dust grain called Boris
COSIMA catches cosmic dust
COSIMA checked out and ready for collecting comet dust

Comments

3 Comments

  • Andreas Koch says:

    I feel very honoured to be mentioned within this ESA Blog …
    I was one of the many people building this scientific space exploring instrument. We all spent lots of hours, days (and yes, nights, weekends 😉 ) for this adventure to reach reality!
    A lot of people contributing to this incredible success are not mentioned within this blog-post, and that is due to the fact, that such a success is carried by a lot of shoulders (hmmmm, don’t know if this “wording” is correct, but you know, what I mean …). We are talking about a project, that started much earlier than my involvement (which was 1998), some of our fellows already passed away, they never recognized their achievement during their lives. Even I don’t know all of them, but those I got to know: Nyle Utterback, Franz Krüger, and especially, my (formerly) boss: Hanna von Hoerner.
    We are talking about long lasting scientific exploration … I’m still part of the scientific team, though I only built the instrument… that makes me proud! I have seen a lot of new faces, young faces, eager to analyze the outcome of the measured data that COSIMA returned to Earth, young people sitting next to the ones still knowing how this instrument was fought for, afterwards developed and then sent into space! This is something that makes me happy! A lot of people dedicated a huge portion of their lives to this instrument (as others did for other instruments onboard ROSETTA and PHILAE). And others are about to use it, for the original purpose: exploring our solar system, our “background” (in terms of some trillion years). I was one of the new engineers when I entered this project, finding my way within this business. A great Job was done by Hartmut Henkel, who was the Project lead at our Company. He alwasy had the focus on the things that were needed to get this piece of metal, motors and especially electronics to work! And there’s still one person to be mentioned: Jochen Kissel, the former Principal Investigator of this incredible instrument, the one, who always fought for this type of instrument to make its way into space, the one, who always knew the technical details about its design, for me, one of the most important person during discussions, how we get this Instrument to work. Thanks a lot Jochen, this was an exhausting, but wonderful time!

    • emily says:

      Thanks for adding to this nice addition, Andreas! 🙂
      Best wishes, Emily

      • ianw16 says:

        Indeed. I’ m loving these posts on the various instruments, and the teams behind them. Puts a more human face on those who are producing the papers that we are reading which, by definition, have to be in the cold, hard language of science.
        Many thanks to all the team members who have posted on the blog.

Comments are closed.