Today’s CometWatch entry features a NAVCAM image of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko taken by Rosetta on 30 May from a distance of about 6.5 km from the surface.
The image captures the boundaries between Imhotep (the smooth region to the right), Bes (left) and Khepry (top and centre) on the large comet lobe. It encapsulates a wide variety of different terrains in a relatively small area, from smooth patches to cross-cutting fractures on exposed walls, and to boulders of various shapes and sizes.
The OSIRIS team also released a new image from the wide-angle camera this week (below), captured on 1 June when Rosetta was 8 km from the comet nucleus. It features part of the fractured Bastet and Wosret regions on the small lobe in the foreground, with the large lobe in the background (and much of the neck region in shadow in between).
Meanwhile an image from the narrow-angle camera (below), taken later in the day on 1 June from a distance of about 20 km, reveals the incredibly dusty nature of the comet. It acts as a reminder of the challenging conditions Rosetta is facing flying close to the nucleus, even many months after the comet’s most active period around perihelion (13 August 2015), the closest approach of the comet to the Sun along its orbit.
The image also captures some impressive details of the neck region of the comet, in particular the fractured boulders that scatter the otherwise smooth surface of Hapi. The rugged cliffs of Hathor on the small comet lobe are also hinted at to the left of the image.
The images featured in this post were captured after Rosetta experienced a safe mode event over the weekend, which was triggered by the spacecraft’s star trackers being confused by comet dust when it was flying ~5 km from the comet surface. The spacecraft has since been recovered and is en route to its planned 30 km orbit.
The original 1024 x 1024 pixel image from today’s NAVCAM CometWatch entry is provided below:
Discussion: 9 comments
Beautiful, hardly random sample of particle-sphere. Also intriguing how so external phenomena suggests about internal structure. To the Gallery.
https://www.esa.int/spaceinimages/Images/2016/06/Comet_on_1_June_2016_OSIRIS_narrow-angle_camera
This particle-o-sphere is progressively pushed down by the pressure cone of the shocked bow. Effectively creating a global ‘dust belt’, on condition of 67P attitude non being fundamentally altered by jetting.
From an initial ‘sphere’ of bonded particles, doesn’t this kind of force ends creating a disk? The closer to surface the sharper?
So, for all orbitally bonded objects, having a ‘feed-back’ mechanism, on 67P 😀
This mechanism competing with ‘throw up’ jetting forces.
Pressure cone much stronger at its axis than jetting out pressure.
Everything is said.
Should start chatting about sub-surface weather dynamics and erosion.
Paraphrased, surface directly over axis of pressure cone of a shocked comet, is a GAS SINK.
Speculating that ISM SURFING Protostars also provided with Material Feed-Back Mechanisms:
“…most of this young star’s water vapor is located in material flowing away from the star, rather than within the disk of matter orbiting around it.”
Congratulating project scientist Pamela Marcum and all the SOFIA Teams.
https://phys.org/news/2016-06-sofia-vapor-young-star.html
In the center of the cirlular shadow to the upper right of the center I can spot a roughly 5-corned white shape with something resembling three legs. Probably it’s too big and too far away from the landing side for Philae?